JEKYLL & HYDE
Director: David Wickes
Writers: Robert Louis Stevenson (novel), David Wickes
Stars:Michael Caine, Cheryl Ladd and Joss Ackland
Cast overview, first billed only: Michael Caine ... Dr. Henry Jekyll / Mr. Edward Hyde Cheryl Ladd ... Sara Crawford Joss Ackland ... Dr. Charles Lanyon Ronald Pickup ... Jeffrey Utterson, Esquire Diane Keen ... Annabel Kim Thomson ... Lucy Harris Kevin McNally ... Sergeant Hornby David Schofield ... Snape Lee Montague ... Inspector Palmer Miriam Karlin ... Mrs. Hackett Lance Percival ... Beresford Mount, Prince's Private Secretary Joan Heal ... Mrs. Clark Frank Barrie ... Poole the Butler Lionel Jeffries ... Jekyll's Father Martin Jacobs ... Young Man
In August 1884 London, the respected Dr. Henry Jekyll (Michael Caine) experiments with a potion that turns him into the monstrous Mr. Hyde. The Hyde part is not such a nice character, though, raping, murdering and breaking stuff if it comes into his path.
Reviews tend to be less than favorable for this film, with Mike Mayo calling it "tepid" and saying that it "never really gets to the heart of the matter." He even blasts the special effects, saying that "the Hyde makeup looks like a lumpy onion with a bad attitude." I accept that the Hyde character is a bit too unhuman, but Mayo mistakes what "the heart of the matter" is.
The story is not centrally concerned with Jekyll or Hyde, but rather the world of technology and science against religion and Victorian values. There is a constant social commentary that the world moves forward and science replaces ignorance, as men increasingly become like gods. Whether this message is right or not is beside the point: it is the argument Jekyll makes to his class against his father-in-law.
I love Michael Caine and everything that he does, but it is Edward Snape, the snooping news reporter, that is by far the most interesting character in this television film.
I thought the film was fun and quite good, regardless of the naysayers. If a version existed with audio commentary or some further insight into the film's background, that would be wonderful. But as it stands, it's a fine film, and a very welcome version of the Jekyll and Hyde story.
|